wojciech.kapcia@tigase.net opened 4 years ago
|
|||||||
@andrzej.wojcik feel free to comment if anything is missing. |
|||||||
I do see a need for a storing value for |
|||||||
What do you mean "deep" values? i.e. parent-child or something else? |
|||||||
exactly. With |
|||||||
wojciech.kapcia@tigase.net batch edited 6 months ago
|
|||||||
wojciech.kapcia@tigase.net added "Related" #1365 3 months ago
|
|||||||
wojciech.kapcia@tigase.net added "Related" helpdesk/helpdesk-priv#1167 3 months ago
|
Type |
Task
|
Priority |
Normal
|
Assignee | |
Version |
Candidate for next major release
|
Spent time |
1h 45m
|
Iterations
Related
-
Customers/catapush-s-r-l#31 You are not authorized to access this issue
Issue Votes (0)
Current UserRepository implementation should be improved:
tig_nodes
and add 'node' column intig_pairs
parent_node
column intig_pairs
to maintain tree-like structurelastModified
column totig_pairs
to help track changes made to entries(and maybe "value hash"? in a vain similar to current UserRepoRepository detection if value was modified)Subsequently, UserRepoRepository should be adjusted and store items individually.
Motivation: