-
@wojtek Should we apply the same fix https://projects.tigase.net/issue/muc-130?
-
I've fixed this issue but it is getting annoying as we already had "almost" the same issue with MySQL #issue #67 but with a difference of 1ms. I've modified previous fix to hopefully fix this, however, I'm not sure why this 1ms offset appeared nor what caused it.
-
Looks ok,
can be merged(could you make a PR in the future as well?). I merged it.As for the issue - it was sent by the client, so I would say it's a client "bug" of sorts (the timestamp itself is not inherently wrong, but it seems they were aiming at 1970…).
Type |
Bug
|
Priority |
Normal
|
Assignee | |
Version |
Candidate for next minor release
|
Issue Votes (0)
Watchers (0)
IMHO a proper IQ error should be returned to user.