-
I think it looks better. One think I've noticed is that it seems that asciidoctor has problem with heading definition while using multiple characters (i.e.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^@) and recommends using @=
(times the level of the heading, i.e. @== title level 2@) for headings, and because of that headings of the statistics names seems to be un-formatted. -
Looks like I'll have to keep in mind to keep headings above level 5 in the final documents, because each document is nested, I'm limited to 4 levels before h5 is used and like you said it's indistinguishable from normal text.
%wojtek please have a look at current docs, everything should be more identifiable now, I'm still not too crazy about how the headings seem smaller than normal text, but this is about the best we can do unless we decide to remove the level 2/(3 in final document) headings for components.
-
I think it looks better now - thank you.
I'm still not too crazy about how the headings seem smaller than normal text, but this is about the best we can do unless we decide to remove the level 2/(3 in final document) headings for components.
Well, we could take the plunge and tweak a bit the CSS of our docs (tho, it will only apply to current html5 output, chunked html is generated via docbook until support for it will finally arrive in asciidoctor, which should probably happen in next version) and change sizes / formatting of the heading to make them more prominent.
Type |
Task
|
Priority |
Normal
|
Assignee | |
RedmineID |
4062
|
Spent time |
0
|
Most of the statistics are self-explanatory, but some are a bit tricky, for example:
Open user connections
Open user sessions
Maximum user sessions
Total user sessions
etc.
It may be a good idea to have a page describing them and also what are the differences to lessen the confusion.
Screenshot 2016-04-22 11.04.24.png