Projects tigase _server server-core Issues #522
Requesting version to own JID returns server version (#522)
Closed
Daniele Ricci opened 9 years ago
Due Date
2015-06-30

Is this intended behaviour?

D / SMACK    ( 9482): SENT (0): <iq to='SELFJID@beta.kontalk.net/eb2e56271013472f' id='WfN3ao' type='get'><query xmlns='jabber:iq:version'></query></iq>
D / SMACK    ( 9482): RECV (0): <iq type="result" id="WfN3ao" xmlns="jabber:client" to="SELFJID@beta.kontalk.net/eb2e56271013472f" from="SELFJID@beta.kontalk.net/eb2e56271013472f"><query xmlns="jabber:iq:version"><name>Tigase</name><version>7.0.2-b3845/104176fa (2015-06-10/20:38:52)</version><os>Linux-amd64-2.6.32-5-amd64, Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM-24.71-b01-Oracle Corporation</os></query></iq>

I think processFromUserToServerPacket is called for the wrong case here. What do you think? I'm afraid I can break some APIs here if I touch something so I'd like your opinion before adding a patch.

Tested on Tigase 7.0.2, but both classes (JabberIqVersion and its parent class) didn't change up to now.

JabberIqVersion-self.diff

Artur Hefczyc commented 9 years ago

What does the spec says about this use-case? It seems like, the Tigase processing might be indeed incorrect.

I just looked at the code and the method: processFromUserPacket might be to simplistic indeed. The XMPP routing logic is actually more complex and it also depends on the packet type. That is, it is a bit different for presence, message and iq. Therefore, the processFromUserPacket might not work well for all possible use-cases.

My suggestion to fix this error would be to reimplement the JabberIQVersion plugin and override the processFromUserPacket method instead to get a correct processing for version stanzas sent to the user himself (most likely the other connection).

Daniele Ricci commented 9 years ago

Thanks Artur, I'll begin working on JabberIqVersion as soon as I can and attach a patch to this issue.

Daniele Ricci commented 9 years ago

Isn't this enough to achive the goal?

Please set the source code disclaimer to yes for me.

wojciech.kapcia@tigase.net commented 9 years ago

Applied in changeset commit:tigase-server|9918d2de.

issue 1 of 1
Type
Bug
Priority
Normal
Assignee
RedmineID
3249
Spent time
7h 30m
Issue Votes (0)
Watchers (0)
Reference
tigase/_server/server-core#522
Please wait...
Page is in error, reload to recover