Bartosz Małkowski opened 3 years ago
-
@andrzej.wojcik it seems this was changes in #issue #1029? As per 6.1 Recommended Rules :
A is eligible for carbons delivery if it does not contain a child element and if at least one of the following is true:
- it is of type "chat".
- it is of type "normal" and contains a element.
- it contains payload elements typically used in IM (Message Delivery Receipts (XEP-0184) [3], Chat State Notifications (XEP-0085) [4], Chat Markers (XEP-0333) [5]).
- it is of type "error" and it was sent in response to a that was eligible for carbons delivery.
- it matches the MUC-related rules outlined below.
I guess we should probably adjust
tigase.xmpp.impl.MessageCarbons#shouldSendCarbonsto includenormaltype of messages withbodyas well? -
@wojtek Most likely we should. I do not recall if originally XEP stated that we should forward "normal" messages or if that was changed at some point.
| Type |
New Feature
|
| Priority |
Normal
|
| Assignee | |
| Version |
Candidate for next major release
|
| Spent time |
0
|
Issue Votes (0)
Watchers (0)
Currently Message Carbons are created and delivered to all entities only if message type is
chat. Should we also apply it to messages with typenormal?